-A +A
Bookmark and Share

Blog

Dec 16, 2010
Rebecca Hendren

By Rebecca Hendren
HealthLeaders Media
December 7, 2010

Nurses are the most trusted professionals in the nation and once again top a list they have dominated for 11 years. Since 1999, the only time nurses have been ousted from the top spot of Gallup's annual survey was in 2001, when firefighters were ranked highest following their heroism on Sept. 11. Not surprisingly, car salespeople, lobbyists, and Congress rank at the bottom of the pile.

Eighty-one percent of Americans say nurses have high or very high honesty and ethical standards. This is much higher than those for the next most trusted professionals, military officers and pharmacists. Physicians are number five on the list.

It's no surprise to anyone in the profession that the general public trusts nurses. When people are hospitalized, nurses are the ones who provide hands-on care, performing intimate and important medical tasks and helping patients return to health. They are patient advocates who often explain complex treatment regimens that help patients understand their care.

So what can nurses do with their status as most-trusted professionals? A different Gallup poll from almost a year ago found that opinion leaders from across the country believe nurses should have greater influence in many healthcare areas—from reducing medical errors to improving efficiency and reducing costs—but that significant barriers continue to block them from fully achieving those goals.

In this older study, the opinion leaders said nurses are not able to exert greater influence and leadership because they are not perceived as important decision makers or revenue generators, compared with physicians, and that nurses do not have a single unified voice with which they speak about national issues.
The issue of revenue generation is one I addressed in a July story in HealthLeaders Magazine. In hospitals, nursing care is billed as part of room and board, so the individual contributions to patient care are not captured as nursing-related. Tracking nursing skill level, time, and costs would enable organizations to determine the impact of nurses on cost and quality.

The second issue, that nursing lacks a unified voice, has plagued the profession for years. Lobbyists from nursing organizations such as the American Nurses Association, American Organization of Nurse Executives, and the National Council for State Boards of Nursing, among many others, all are seeking access to the same spheres of influence. It's time nursing settled on some agreed principles and worked toward the same goal. The American Medical Association is a good example. Physicians may disagree on individual issues but Congress can be confident that the AMA speaks for physicians in this country.

The lack of voice can be improved at a local level as well. Highly-educated, experienced, and with a wealth of knowledge about patient needs, nurse leaders are ideal candidates to serve on boards of directors for healthcare organizations. Too few boards contain permanent nursing representation and too few nurses consider it attainable.

Nurses at the bedside can leverage their trusted positions and take responsibility for getting things done. Joining committees, becoming knowledgeable about quality improvement, communicating effectively with the healthcare team, and speaking up for their patients are ways to be accountable for nursing and its influence.

Nurses can't afford to let others make decisions about nursing and healthcare for them. The stage has been set and it's time to grab the opportunity.

Reprinted with permission.  © 2010 HealthLeaders Media, www.healthleadersmedia.com

Dec 9, 2010
Pathway to Excellence

Patricia Deyo, BSN, BA, RN

On TV, hospital heroes are usually physicians, rushing to a patient’s bedside whenever an alarm goes off. But in real life, nurses are the first responders to patient emergencies. When it’s you or a loved one in that hospital bed, you hope that your nurse is 100% focused.  

Burnout is a fact of life in nursing today, so healthcare organizations are looking for innovative ways to create work environments where nurses feel engaged and inspired. Research shows that these healthy work environments improve not only nurse satisfaction, but also patient safety, patient satisfaction, and quality of care.

So why isn’t everybody doing it? It may seem simple, but creating a positive work environment is challenging, especially in today’s complex healthcare climate. While many hospitals and healthcare organizations successfully implement some aspects, they fall short on others.

With this in mind, the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) established the Pathway to Excellence® Program to recognize healthcare facilities that create healthy work environments where nurses can flourish. To earn this mark of excellence, a hospital must show that it has incorporated specific standards into its day-to-day operations, including:

  • A patient-centric, safe, and healthy work environment
  • Abundant opportunities for nurses to expand and improve their skills
  • A focus on collaboration, quality, and evidence-based practice 

This is good news for nurses, but it’s even better news for patients. High nurse satisfaction and retention directly impact quality of care. The Pathway credential tells consumers that a hospital’s quality and safety outcomes are second to none. It provides them with the ultimate benchmark when choosing a healthcare facility.

There are now 57 Pathway to Excellence designated hospitals in the United States, and the number continues to grow. Success in the acute care environment has spawned the Pathway to Excellence in Long Term Care™ Program, which recognizes the essential elements of an optimal work environment in skilled nursing facilities, nursing homes, and assisted living centers.

It’s the first program of its kind in the country and comes at a crucial time. As our population continues to age, quality long-term care is increasingly important to all of us. The Pathway designation reassures families that their loved ones will receive safe, high quality care in an environment of excellence from nurses [with long-term care expertise] who are focused, motivated, and fulfilled.

Nov 2, 2010
Deloras Jones

By Deloras Jones
Executive Director
California Institute for Nursing & Health Care

After so much hard work by so many to increase the number of graduating nurses, the San Francisco Bay Area isn’t offering many new jobs to our new nursing grads right now.  Have our efforts been too successful in overcoming educational undercapacity and reducing the nursing shortage the past few years? Not really. It’s just a case of bad timing.  The economy has created a tight job market and employers are filling the few slots they have with experienced nurses, who are working more and taking the jobs that new graduates expected to fill.  In addition, many health care employers no longer have budgets for new graduate transition programs. This leaves California's new nurses with fewer opportunities to gain experience and transition successfully into practice. 

At the California Institute for Nursing & Health Care (www.cinhc.org) we are publicizing that this temporary dip on the supply curve does not signal the end of an evolving shortage. Rather, as the newly insured begin to seek care and as the economy recovers, the demand for nurses will increase sharply. Older nurses will scale back hours and retire.  Previous estimates of RN demand will become reality: the California Employment Development Department estimates that 10,900 new nurses each year will be required to replace retiring nurses.

So, California nursing leaders, ever enterprising, creative and adaptive, responded to this mounting crisis. For example, CINHC has partnered with foundations, including the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Kaiser Permanente Fund for Health Education at the East Bay Community Foundation, and Kaiser Permanente Northern California Community Benefit, to secure funding to establish New Graduate RN Transition Programs. These programs, in partnership with hospitals and community-based health care agencies, provide nurses additional education, coaching and clinical experience to improve their competence and professional skillssmoothing the transition from education to employment. 

The programs incorporate clinical, didactic, simulation, and e-learning components.  They run approximately 24 hours each week over 12-18 weeks. Academic credit is given, along with an industry-recognized certificate of completion.

Four school-based programs have been established: at Samuel Merritt University, University of San Francisco, California State University-East Bay, and a collaboration of South Bay schools, including San Jose State University and San Jose/Evergreen Community College District through the Workforce Institute.  These are non-paid training experiences and participation does not guarantee employment.

So much progress has been made in expanding the Bay Area’s and California’s nursing education capacity. It would be a tragic error to roll back these programs due to a temporary, though painful hiring slump. We can ill afford to narrow the educational pipeline again and suffer the consequencesa potentially insurmountable gap in assuring an adequate nursing supply ever again.  The consequences would be increased costs,  diminished quality of bedside care, and millions of individuals with newly coveted insurance coverage, but limited access to quality care.  Through innovative programs, such as the New Graduate RN Transition Program, we believe we can keep these concerns from becoming a reality.  

Sep 29, 2010
M. Christina R. Esperat

By M. Christina R. Esperat, RN, PhD, FAAN
Professor and Associate Dean for Clinical Services and Community Engagement
The School of Nursing, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas

One of the drivers of the current health care reform movement is the lack of access to primary health care, particularly for vulnerable populations within American society. This is an opportune moment for nurse-managed health centers, a largely unheralded group of primary health care providers, to accept responsibility for shaping the health care reform movement, thereby improving health care for their consumers. A model for the nurse-managed health center is a full service primary health care clinic administered by nurses and whose services are essentially provided by advanced practice nurses. In Texas, the Larry Combest Community Health and Wellness Center (LCCHWC) is one such clinic located in a medically underserved area in East Lubbock, providing what are primarily health promotion and disease prevention activities within the city of Lubbock’s most economically deprived area. Clinic patients come from diverse backgrounds, but predominantly, the typical profile is that of a low-income, working family with members who do not have health insurance coverage. Majority belong to minority ethnic groups, predominately Hispanic, with a significant population of African-Americans.  Administered by the School of Nursing at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, the academic nursing center essentially has three operations: 1) the primary care clinic; 2) the American Diabetes Association-certified Diabetes Education Center; and 3) the Senior House Calls Program, a primary care service for home-bound elders. 
 
In March of 2009, the LCCHWC achieved status as a federally qualified health center (FQHC). It has thus joined the ranks of a very few of the nation’s nurse-managed health centers which are recognized FQHCs. It achieved FQHC status as a public entity model, and this further sets it apart from the vast majority of the traditional private, non-profit FQHCs. The Center is managed and care is provided by Advance Practice Nurses.   The Executive Director is a doctorally-prepared nurse administrator, and the clinical providers are Family Nurse Practitioners as well as one Women’s Health Nurse Practitioner. The LCCHWC further improves access to quality health care services for residents of its catchment areas by providing home visitation services through the Nurse-Family Partnership Program and the Patient Navigator Program for chronic disease self management. As one of Lubbock’s best-kept secrets, the LCCHWC is truly a “light under a bushel”!

Editor's Note: The National Nursing Centers Consortium has organized the first-ever "National Nurse-Managed Health Clinic Week" this year from October 3-9. This blog was submitted as part of this week-long celebration.

Sep 21, 2010
Dennis Sherrod

By Dennis Sherrod EdD, RN

Editor's Note: Sherrod's blog was written in respone to an article that appeared in the DallasNews.com on August 17.

I’d like to respond to the DallasNews.com article titled “Heralded nurse knows his calling” by stating that “Heralded nurses know their calling”. Nursing is a demanding and growing profession. The current shortage is being fueled by baby boomers reaching the ages of 65 and 85, the golden years of care services demand while at the same time our nurse workforce is rapidly moving towards retirement. We need more men and women in the nursing profession.

Currently there are approximately more than 3 million nurses in the U.S. and the US Bureau of Labor Statistics has designated the Registered Nurse as the fastest growing occupation in the US. While a national economic decline has placed a “hold” on numerous nurse positions, the demand for nurses continues to grow. We will need to work together to attract both men and women alike while making sure nurses are recognized and valued for their expertise and contributions in health care.

Health care reform promises to expand demands for registered nurses as well as advanced practice nurses so we need to let young people know that nursing is a rewarding and challenging profession. As we consider recruitment into the profession we’ll need to focus on:

  • The intellectual challenge and high level of knowledge nursing involves
  • Variety of work at all levels
  • Variety of work settings that employee nurses
  • Career progression and clinical advancement models
  • Wide range of career opportunities within nursing
  • Nurses as autonomous practitioners
  • Nursing’s goal to “help people” and “make a difference” in people’s lives.

We need to let people know that a majority of Americans are pleased if their daughter or son would like to become a registered nurse and an overwhelming majority of the public trusts information about health care provided by registered nurses.

Men in nursing do encounter stereotypes. But women in nursing encounter stereotypes as well. And other professions are also confronted with stereotypes (think attorneys). Each nurse professional must do our part to correct stereotypes and inform the public of the value nursing brings to health care.

I applaud nurse colleague Gary Springer’s commitment to his patients and to the profession of nursing. I agree with the author that we need “compassionate people” who care about people and want to make a difference in the lives of their clients and families. We do need all of those we can get!

Aug 25, 2010
Tina Johnson

By Tina Johnson, CNM, MS
Director, Professional Practice & Health Policy
American College of Nurse-Midwives

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will bring millions of newly insured citizens into the health care system.  In order to meet the country’s needs, leaders are calling for high value, evidence-based solutions.  Let’s start with the health condition that affects 100% of all Americans...childbirth!  How can we provide high quality, high value maternity care for all women and families?  The answers are in the evidence:  midwifery care improves maternal and newborn outcomes and patient satisfaction, reduces health disparities, and saves money and resources.

The U.S. grossly outspends every other nation per capita on health care, yet our maternal and newborn outcomes lag far behind those of other developed nations.  Childbirth is the number one reason for hospitalization, and its related hospital charges surpass those of any other health condition.  Resource-intensive interventions like labor induction, epidural analgesia and cesarean section are overused, often without indication or consideration of alternatives, resulting in increased risk of maternal and newborn harm.

Cesarean section is the single most common operating room procedure in the U.S., and the rate is steadily climbing.  Incredibly, in 2007, nearly one-third of American women delivered their babies by cesarean section.  Maternal mortality has risen dramatically, and glaring racial disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes persist.

How can we reverse these disturbing trends?  Ensure that all women have access to maternity care providers and practices that support the normal processes of birth. Labor support, freedom of movement, intermittent monitoring, alternative birth settings, vaginal birth after cesarean...all have been identified as evidence-based practices that are underused.

Midwives truly are the experts in supporting healthy vaginal birth in all settings.  Midwives caring for low-risk women improve infant mortality rates in both hospitals and birth centers when compared with physicians caring for equally low-risk women.  Midwife-led models of group prenatal care reduce preterm and low birthweight rates and improve patient satisfaction. Birth centers provide improved outcomes for even the most at-risk women, reducing preterm birth, low birthweight and cesarean section rates, and reducing costs to our health care system.  Skilled midwifery care is the gold standard among nations with the best maternal and neonatal outcomes, and has been identified as essential to reducing maternal mortality worldwide. 

It’s time to bring that message back home.  The time is now to promote and support midwifery in America--and to follow the evidence.

Visit the American College of Nurse- Midwives to learn more about their activities and join the conversation at Midwife Connection.

Aug 16, 2010
Rebecca Hendren

By Rebecca Hendren
HealthLeaders Media
August 10, 2010
 

It's that time of year again. Graduating nursing students are preparing to take the NCLEX and are looking for their first jobs. This year, many are finding those first jobs in short supply.

Reports are rampant of new graduates being unable to find open positions in their specialty of choice, and even more shockingly, many are finding it tough to find any openings at all.

These new RNs entered school with the promise that nursing is a recession-proof career. They were told the nursing shortage would guarantee them employment whenever and wherever they wanted.

So what happened? Has the nursing shortage—that we've heard about incessantly for years—suddenly gone away?

The short term answer is clearly yes, although in the long term, unfortunately, the shortage will still be there.

The recession has brought a temporary reprieve to the shortage. Nurses who were close to retirement have seen their 401(k) portfolios plummet and their potential retirement income decline. They are postponing retirement a few more years until the economy—and their portfolios—pick up.

Many nurses have seen their spouses and partners lose their jobs and have increased their hours to make ends meet for their families. Some who left the profession to care for children or for other reasons have rejoined the workforce for similar reasons.

In addition, many hospitals are not hiring. The recession brought hiring freezes to healthcare facilities across the country, and many are still in effect. Help wanted ads for healthcare professionals dropped by 18,400 listings in July, even as the overall economy saw a modest increase of 139,200 in online job listings.

Organizations that are hiring may simply have positions for fewer new grads than in the past. This leads to fears that new grads will accept positions simply to have a job, and then jump ship when something better comes along. The chief nursing officer of a Kansas City hospital told me her organization is trying to protect against that by taking extra care when screening new graduates. Instead of just one interview, they now bring candidates back for a second interview to ensure they are really committed to the organization before they are hired.

They also offer a nursing residency program that helps bridge the gap between school and practice and provides the mentoring and support needed to thrive at the organization.

In rural areas, hospitals worry that recent graduates who can't find a job will move away. Some organizations take the view that it's better to get new grads into the system in some capacity, even if not a perfect fit, and then accept internal turnover as positions come along. This allows the organization to nurture the new nurses and build their engagement by focusing on their professional development and proving they are committed to the growth of the nurse within the organization.

Once the economy improves, many of these issues will go away and new grads will once again have their pick of opportunities. And in the not-too-distant-future, the aging population will prove that the nursing shortage never really went away.

Reprinted with permission.  © 2010 HealthLeaders Media, www.healthleadersmedia.com

 

Aug 12, 2010
Andrea Brassard

By Andrea Brassard, DNSc, MPH, FNP, Strategic Policy Advisor, Center to Champion Nursing in America at AARP

In my role as Strategic Policy Advisor for the Center to Champion Nursing in America, I think daily about the need to expand consumer access to advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs). But it is when I put on my clinician hat (or rather white coat) that I see the critical link that must be made between ensuring APRNs can provide the services for which they are trained and experienced and ensuring that Americans have access to health care coverage. This was never clearer than last week when I volunteered at the DC Cares Free Clinic, sponsored by the National Association of Free Clinics. More than 1,000 people came to this one-day free health clinic to get the basic health services they can't afford or are otherwise denied because they have no insurance. The District of Columbia has 57,200 residents without insuranceand there are millions of uninsured in nearby Maryland and Virginia.

As a nurse practitioner, I was there as a clinician to provide primary care assessment, diagnosis and to work with patients on developing treatment plans. At the DC Cares Free Clinic, nurse practitioners and physician assistants worked side by side with physicians, each clinician providing primary care to the more than 1,200 patients we saw that day. In the District, APRNs can practice independently; that is, we can diagnose, prescribe and otherwise treat patients without physician oversight.

As I began to see patients, the experience underscored what I’ve long knownwhat patients without access to health care will do to get by and the health risks these actions pose.

The question"what meds are you taking?" became "what meds were you taking before you ran out?"  One man borrowed diabetic medications from his brother and friends. One woman who I’ll call Louise (not her real name) ran out of her thyroid medication just that morning. Louise told me that she has seen a veterinarian (for her cats) more often than a physician since she lost her job. I was able to write $4 and $10 generic prescriptions for Louise. Louise was 54 and had not had a mammogram in 3 years.  She put off her last mammogram and then lost her full time job two years ago. I was able to refer Louise for a free mammogram (and a Pap smear) at Howard University Cancer Center. The other screening test that Louise needed is a colonoscopy, which is likely out of reach for her until she can obtain private health insurance, or until her “Welcome to Medicare” exam. 

At the end of my shift I introduced myself to Nicole Lamoureux, Executive Director of the National Association of Free Clinics. Nicole and I recently were appointed to a Department of Health and Human Services Committee to review and update the criteria used to define medically underserved areas and health professional shortage areas. The committee was formed as part of the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

You would not think that the District of Columbia was a medically underserved area. Yet, according to the DC Department of Health, approximately 45% of the population of the District resides in a medically underserved area.

APRNs, such as nurse practitioners, should be an important point of access for our underserved communities. In fact, DC has the largest percentage of nurse practitioners per population in the nation. Karen Scipio-Skinner, the Executive Director of the DC Board of Nursing thinks that the large number of NPs per population is due to the District’s APRN rules and regulations. APRNs can practice in the District without the barriers found in other jurisdictions. They can practice independently without physician supervision or collaboration agreements and prescribe medications without protocol requirements.

This is good news for consumers of health care. The District, like a number of states across the country who also allow independent practice for nurse practitioners, is well-positioned to take advantage of more funding for primary care and community-based health centers found in the recently passed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Jul 28, 2010
John Rother

On Wednesday, July 28, CCNA's Coalition members came together to discuss health care and the future of nursing from the consumer, business, and payer and provider perspectives. John Rother, AARP Executive Vice President for Policy and Strategy, spoke to the group on "where we need to go in health care delivery—and why that will require a much larger role for the nursing profession.”

According to Rother, the success of health reform depends on innovations in delivery that increase efficiency while maintaining quality, and nurses should play a major role in making health care reform work for patients, for providers, and for payers. He noted that the new health care law takes some important steps in the right direction, "but it doesn’t go far enough."  Read the entire speech here.

John Rother is AARP Executive Vice President for Policy & Strategy.

 

Jul 12, 2010
Susan Hassmiller

With Susan Hassmiller, PhD, RN, FAAN, Director of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing, at the Institute of Medicine.

As senior advisor for nursing for the nation's largest health care philanthropy, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Susan B. Hassmiller has had nursing in her blood from an early age. From candy striper to nurse's aide to nurse to the director of the RWJF Initiative on the Future of Nursing, at the Institute of Medicine, Hassmiller is spending her summer vacation in Europe, retracing the steps of the legendary Florence Nightingale.  In this and upcoming posts in the American Journal of Nursing's Off the Charts blog, Hassmiller reports on her inspiring trip to London, at Embley Park and Istanbul, Turkey and what it means to her work today. Below is an excerpt from Sue's first post.

Eighteen years old and ‘hot to trot.’ That’s what I thought I was. Having just been admitted into nursing school, I was set to change the world…one patient at a time. They tried to teach me about Florence Nightingale, but she was someone from the past…not likely to help me learn to start IVs, put in catheters, or run ventilators. If there were iPods back then, I would have used mine to avoid lessons about how Florence Nightingale changed the face of nursing forever. Read the full post here.

Update: Sue Hassmiller answers six questions about her trip for RWJF's Sharing Nursing's Knowledge (August 2010).

 

Syndicate content